Reading in

There's a very-typical New Yorker article up, Future Reading. It's got all the wooly-headed prose you'd expect, as well as the sweeping generalizations that sound good and erudite but upon further puzzlement collapse like so much froth, and as always the overiding sense that the article comes as a finely-observed well-chewed dispatch from some alternate universe, so very much like ours but perhaps half a beat behind our messy timestream.

Nevertheless, some nuggets:

Cheap but durable editions like those of Bohn’s Library brought books other than the Bible into working-class households, and newspapers, which in the late nineteenth century sometimes appeared every hour, made breaking news and social commentary available across all social ranks.

Wow... so there are some-- surprisingly major--newspapers which don't update as often as their 19th century brethren!

Now even the most traditional-minded scholar generally begins by consulting a search engine. As a cheerful editor at Cambridge University Press recently told me, “Conservatively, ninety-five per cent of all scholarly inquiries start at Google.”

The article points to the Online Computer Library Center and its fascinating ">map with details on each country's library system, which leads to this observation:

Sixty million Britons have a hundred and sixteen million public-library books at their disposal, while more than 1.1 billion Indians have only thirty-six million. Poverty, in other words, is embodied in lack of print as well as in lack of food. The Internet will do much to redress this imbalance, by providing Western books for non-Western readers. What it will do for non-Western books is less clear.